Join us for Nightly J6 updates and Live prayers at 9PM ET!


🙏🙏https://t.me/ThePrisonersRecord?livestream

4-part Video Course by David Barton and Rick Green

Online Only - Hosted by Alan Jackson

Learn how to restore America’s Fundamental Principles

7:00pm - 9:00pm CT (Wednesdays)

Event Dates: March 11, 2026 – April 01, 2026

To register for these free classes, go to,

https://www.patriotacademy.com/coach/find-a-class

Chief Justice John Jay - Charge to the Grand Jury of Ulster County, New York - 1777
***
“Every member of the State ought diligently to read and to study the constitution of his country, and teach the rising generation to be free," By knowing their rights, they will sooner perceive when they are violated and be the better prepared to defend and assert them."
***
Read - Study - Teach - Know - Defend - Assert
***
Constitution Alive - page 18
Biblical Citizenship in Modern America - page 19
***

Mark 9 - 11
Transfiguration, demon cast out through prayer, who is the greatest?, avoid temptation, divorce and remarriage, little children allowed, rich young ruler, Jesus foretells his death a 3rd time, blind Bartemaeus, Triumphal Entry, temple cleansed, withered fig tree, and Jesus' authority challenged)

J6ers Hank Muntzer and Brandon Bradshaw join from Texas for an update.

May you be blessed as you read and pray along with us. 🙏

Join us for Nightly J6 updates and Live prayers at 9PM ET!


🙏🙏https://t.me/ThePrisonersRecord?livestream

Mark 12 - 14:42
(Unfaithful tenants, "Render unto Caesar...and unto God, resurrection question, kingdom of God, how is Messiah David's Lord, widow's offering, destruction of temple foretold, end of the age, abomination of desolation, false christs, coming of the Son of Man, signs of the times, Stay Awake!, Passover/Lord's Supper, and Jesus' prayers of submission to the Father's will)

Blessings as you read, fellowship, and pray along with us. 🙏

Barack Obama once offered what sounded like a confession: “The United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government.” Ron Paul turned that line into a moral cudgel, blaming a CIA coup for everything from the 1953 crisis to the 1979 Islamic Revolution and the hostage drama that followed. For many Americans, that settled it: we were the prime movers of Iran’s tragedy.
​
A recent video challenges that story by going back to Iran’s own constitutional order. Its starting point is blunt: Mohammad Mossadegh, the supposed “democratically elected” hero, was a nobleman appointed—and removable—by the Shah. Under the 1906–1907 constitution, as a Tablet article it cites notes, “the Shah alone had the authority to appoint and dismiss prime ministers,” a power he used repeatedly before 1953 without anyone calling it a coup.
​
Mossadegh was a Western‑educated nationalist and political tactician who wanted to wrest Iran’s oil from British control. But when parliament and rivals pushed back, he demanded emergency powers and tried to dissolve the Majlis, concentrating authority in his own hands. In that light, the video argues, he looks less like a martyred democrat and more like a leader testing how far he could go in sidelining checks on his power.
​
Operation Ajax—the CIA–MI6 effort to unseat him—was real: foreign services printed flyers, spread cash, and tried to stiffen the Shah’s resolve. Later memoirs inflated those actions into a tale of omnipotent spymasters. Set against the constitutional text and Iranian street politics, their role shrinks. The crucial act in August 1953 was the Shah doing what the law explicitly allowed: dismissing his own prime minister. The decisive energy in Tehran came from Iranians—royalists, clerics, merchants, and ordinary citizens—choosing sides.

What followed matters more than the myth. Under the Shah, Iran modernized at high speed: land reform, industrial growth, mass schooling, and aggressive expansion of education for girls. Newsreels show unveiled women in stylish clothes, crowded universities, and by the late 1970s women made up close to half of all medical graduates. The monarchy was repressive—its secret police tortured opponents—but the overall trajectory was toward a more secular, more prosperous, more outward‑looking society.

If the CIA “caused” the Islamic Revolution, it did so on a 26‑year delay. The video points instead to a mounting cultural and political clash. Modernization weakened traditional elites and enraged clerics; Western culture, once distant, was suddenly everywhere. Iran’s old mix of monarchists, nationalists, leftists, and Islamists hardened into a sharper divide between those who embraced the new secular Iran and those who saw it as a betrayal of Islam. Into that divide stepped Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, promising purity, justice, and Islamic government.
​
Here Mossadegh’s story becomes ominous foreshadowing. His bid to dissolve parliament and centralize power previewed a deeper temptation: to treat pluralism as a nuisance and concentrate authority in the hands of the “virtuous.” The Islamic Republic turned that impulse into a system. After 1979, Iran built a state around the Supreme Leader and “guardian jurists,” enforced by Revolutionary Guards and religious police, claiming divine sanction for repression. What Mossadegh flirted with, the theocracy perfected.

Outwardly, the new regime became a hub for militant Islam, funding and arming groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. Inwardly, it imposed veiling, speech controls, and ideological conformity far beyond anything seen under the Shah. Whatever one thinks of the monarchy, the Islamic Republic has proved more intrusive in daily life and more systematically violent toward dissent.

Video

"There's more legal abortions performed now than when Roe v. Wade was the law of the land." — Senator Hawley on announcement to legislate the banning of Mifepristone to protect life, especially when it is forced upon women by Planned Parenthood or the father.

YouTube

PRAYER CALL FOR TINA PETERS TODAY‼️‼️‼️

11:00 AM PT
2:00 PM ET

Dial: 669-274-9260

When you enter, please say hello and go on mute to reduce crosstalk. Thank you!

https://tinapeters.us/

God bless!

Please Repost

America’s elections are only as strong as the trust that each citizen’s vote counts—and that no illegal ballot cancels it out. That is why the SAVE America Act should be the Senate’s top priority, not one item on a crowded to‑do list.

Instead, Senate Majority Leader John Thune plans to stage what amounts to a show vote. He’ll bring the bill to the floor without using the talking filibuster strategy that could actually force it through a hostile, 60‑vote Senate. In plain English: he is walking this bill into an ambush, letting it die, and hoping voters are too busy to notice that he chose the easiest path for himself and the hardest path for election integrity.

Why avoid the talking filibuster? Because it is hard, public, and impossible to fake.

A real talking filibuster ties the Senate in knots. Senators must hold the floor, speak for hours, sleep on couches, and sacrifice fundraising dinners and TV hits. The majority has to stay in the chamber too, ready to block adjournment and keep the lights on. It is the opposite of business as usual. It exposes who is willing to suffer to protect the vote—and who folds when the schedule gets uncomfortable.

Under current rules, there are two paths to end that fight. The classic way is to reach 60 votes for cloture, which formally cuts off debate and leads to a final vote on the bill. The other way—what conservatives are demanding on the SAVE America Act—is to force a real talking filibuster and simply outlast the other side, keeping the Senate in session until opponents run out of speeches or give up. Either way, once debate is over, the final vote on the bill itself requires only a simple majority: 51 votes, or 50 plus the vice president.

That is the point Thune does not like to say out loud. Republicans already have over 50 votes for this bill. If they could either secure cloture or break a talking filibuster by sheer endurance, the SAVE America Act would pass. The problem is not the final vote. The problem is whether GOP leadership is willing to do the hard, messy work on the front end to get there.

And the bill itself is hardly radical. The SAVE America Act would require documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration in federal elections, mandate photo ID for voting, and push states to remove non‑citizens from federal voter rolls. Supporters see it as the bare minimum in an age of mass migration, sloppy list‑keeping, and endless lawsuits over election rules. Opponents call it “voter suppression.” But both sides agree on one fact: the stakes are enormous. If ineligible votes ever dilute lawful ones, the entire system’s legitimacy is at risk.

When the stakes are that high, “we don’t have 60 votes” is not leadership. It is an excuse.

Thune knows something else: Donald Trump has already said he will not sign any other legislation until the SAVE America Act reaches his desk. House conservatives are signaling they will block other bills until the Senate acts. In other words, the usual D.C. game is over. The president and a large share of the Republican base have drawn a line in the sand: no more business as usual until elections are secured.

Yet Thune is behaving like it is still 2014. The old playbook is simple: schedule a vote you know will fail, blame the other party, send a fundraising email about how hard you fought, and move on to the next spending bill. That worked when voters weren’t paying close attention. It does not work anymore. Millions of Americans now believe—rightly—that our election system has been treated like a joke, and that Washington has done almost nothing serious to fix it.

If Thune wanted to prove them wrong, here is what he would do.

He would announce that the SAVE America Act comes first—before spending bills, before pet projects, before the comforts of the Senate club. He would commit to holding the floor open as long as it takes. If Democrats want to block the bill, let them talk. Let the country watch them explain, hour after hour, why proof of citizenship and voter ID are somehow too much to ask in federal elections. (Cont. below)

That is what a real leader would welcome: a clear fight, in the open, over who stands with the citizen voter and who does not.

Instead, we are being offered a fake fight. A vote designed to fail. A majority leader who shrugs and says “the math is the math,” while refusing to use the one tactic that would flip the math on its head: forcing the other side to pay a real price in time, energy, and political exposure if they want to bury this bill.

In the coming weeks, the question is not just whether the SAVE America Act passes. It is whether the Senate has the courage to make election integrity the non‑negotiable foundation of everything else, or whether it will cling to its lazy routines and hope the public forgets.

Join us for Nightly J6 updates and Live prayers at 9PM ET!


🙏🙏https://t.me/ThePrisonersRecord?livestream

Mark 14:43 - chapter 16
Jesus' betrayal and arrest, false trial, Peter's denial, Pilate's delivery of Christ to be crucified, mockery, crucifixion, death, burial, resurrection, angelic pronouncement, etc.

Deep discussion, prayers, and fellowship.

Blessings as you listen. 🙏