What are your thoughts? Does James Talafreako make more sense than establishment John Cornyn?

Proposal: 1. Eliminate the Diesel tax , worth $0.18 savings per gallon to improve affordability. And 2. Eliminate archaic building regulations for the housing industry to make housing more affordable.

$0.18 savings for six dollar diesel promises big savings, yes?

Last I checked, the Senate spent issue housing permits or do inspections on constructions.

Why did Faux News give Talarico a pass? Is Talarico about as good as Cornyn on effectiveness and leadership?

Time for Trump to go scorched earth, get rid of all the likes of Cornyn and Tillis and Massey and drain the swamp! The pain is worth it if honest people get into office, serve one tem and not make corruption a career.

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/zfKuU5m80p0

https://youtube.com/shorts/OLu4Yf780VA?si=P2XfAUyGKZb-QsSa

Trump is just trolling a little bit about asking Dana White to be press secretary 😂

Very well said, Benny! Conservatives don't crash out with the fraudulent blue tsunami, because we have a lot to live for, not just politics. Most of all we have God!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=i2gsB7tw2WI

Trump speaks clearly. Why do people complain he rambles? 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3Pxg5EwpWrY

“[1] Therefore I urge you, brethren, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies a living and holy sacrifice, acceptable to God, which is your spiritual service of worship. ”
Romans 12:1 NASB1995

https://bible.com/bible/100/rom.12.1.NASB1995

There is a Democrat well funded network that strips away the swng voters and a fair number of flaky Republicans. They messaged through their door knocking and social network including social media that Trump's economic policies are worse for Americans and Democrats have the solution for the affordability problem.

This network actually exists and it is active in Alaska with some operatives being conservatives who are absolutely convinced of the truth in their messaging.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhPQjfIFSdo

The claim in Patrick Byrne’s Telegram posts (starting at https://t.me/PatrickMByrne/15946 and the next two) is a conspiracy theory that overlays real intelligence failures with an unsupported narrative of deliberate intentional stand-down.

What Byrne claims

In the three-part Telegram series, Byrne asserts that Shin Bet (under then-chief Ronen Bar) and the IDF agreed on a stand-down: no/low troops on the border, no alert to Netanyahu, and no warning to the Nova festival, all to avoid a Hamas “miscalculation.” He frames Bar as a “Wexner Fellow” (linked to Les Wexner/Epstein) and part of an Ehud Barak-aligned “Israeli deep state” that deliberately allowed the attack to succeed so Israel would have justification for destroying Gaza. He cites released Israeli documents and dismisses a Haaretz report about a UAE warning to Netanyahu as a smokescreen.

What the evidence actually shows

Official Shin Bet and IDF investigations (released in 2025), contemporaneous reporting, and public records document catastrophic intelligence and readiness failures, not a deliberate plot:

Shin Bet and military intelligence had Hamas’s “Jericho Wall”/invasion plans (from 2018 and 2022) but did not treat a large-scale ground assault as a realistic threat. There was overconfidence in the high-tech border fence, a preference for quiet and economic incentives, and a conceptual failure to view Hamas as a full military force rather than a terrorist group focused mainly on the West Bank.

On the night of October 6–7, there were anomalous signs (including activation of dozens of Israeli SIM cards by Hamas units, similar to prior non-attack periods). Shin Bet issued a low-urgency warning around 3:03 a.m. to the IDF, police, and National Security Council about unusual activity that “may point to an offensive action.” Assessments still concluded Hamas was not interested in escalation or a full campaign. A specialized Tequila counter-terror team was deployed, but there was no full national alert or mass mobilization.

“Miscalculation” concerns were real and documented: security officials worried that visible high readiness or certain actions could provoke Hamas into an unintended escalation amid a containment policy. Released transcripts reference maintaining “medium readiness” covertly for this reason. This is risk aversion and misreading of intentions, not an order to let a massacre proceed.

Ronen Bar has acknowledged the agency’s failure (“if the Shin Bet had acted differently… the massacre would have been avoided”) and resigned. He and his successor have explicitly rejected claims of treason, collaboration, or deliberate withholding. Bar has sued Netanyahu over related accusations. Current Shin Bet leadership has stated there was “no treason or collaboration.”

Ronen Bar was a Wexner Israel Fellow (the long-running program that sent mid-career Israeli public officials to Harvard’s Kennedy School; the foundation later cut ties with Harvard over its post-Oct. 7 response). Les Wexner had documented Epstein ties, which have drawn criticism. Many Israeli officials across the spectrum participated; the fellowship does not demonstrate a plot or loyalty to any “deep state” cabal. Ehud Barak is a longtime political opponent of Netanyahu.

The initial response was slow and chaotic (hours before substantial reinforcements in some areas), consistent with surprise, incomplete picture, and underestimation of the scale (roughly 1,200 killed, 250+ taken hostage). Soldier accounts of delayed patrols or orders related to specific threats (e.g., anti-tank) exist and fit within the broader documented readiness shortfalls; they do not establish a high-level deliberate stand-down to enable success.

On the motive

There is no credible public evidence that Shin Bet (or any “deep state” element) intentionally allowed Hamas to massacre civilians so Israel would have justification for the subsequent Gaza campaign. The war’s scale followed from the attack’s magnitude and the hostage situation. Political blame-shifting exists in both directions (Netanyahu emphasizing security-establishment failures; others noting government policy of containment and economic ties that strengthened Hamas), but the intentional-facilitation claim remains speculative conspiracy framing.

In short, the documented record is one of profound analytical, conceptual, and operational failure by the security services under a policy of containment—not a coordinated stand-down order unknown to Netanyahu to green-light Hamas success for political ends. Byrne’s posts correctly note some real elements (warnings that were under-weighted, “miscalculation” caution, no immediate red-phone call) but construct an unproven plot around them. Official probes and the rejection of collaboration theories by the agencies themselves point against the claim.

Gerald Heikes, Republican candidate in Alaska's Senate race, is just as much of a Democrat plant as Decoy Dan. 👇🏿

Effective governance! Florida AG designated CAIR a terrorist organization and now they are gone from Florida, but not gone from the US. Red states should follow right away Florida's example.

This is a thoughtful commentary. 👇

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pMGE3oOaeSE

The Justice Department unsealed an indictment against three individuals for supporting an Iranian-backed terror network (01:29-01:46).

Prosecutors allege this network was involved in nearly 20 attacks or attempted attacks across Europe and the United States, including arson, explosives, and a fatal stabbing in London (02:07-02:21).

A significant part of this plot involved a suspected plan to attack RAF Fairford in the UK, a base used by American bombers (02:25-02:47). Federal prosecutors allege that one of the coordinators, a 32-year-old man, was directing activities for this terror network from inside a U.S. prison while awaiting trial on separate terrorism charges (04:40-05:13, 06:44-07:00).


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_Dmt7K81DAQ

The recent shake-up in the White House following the departure of former Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and her replacement by Stephen Miller (-). The administrative changes under Miller, who is reported to be loosening the tight control previously held by Wiles, encourages cabinet secretaries to speak more freely about the administration's agenda (-).

Administrative Shift: Stephen Miller is portrayed as an outsider to K Street lobbyists, contrasting with Susie Wiles, who had ties to the major lobbying firm Ballard Partners (-).

Corruption Allegations: The video highlights accusations made by former health adviser Cali Means, who alleges that Wiles and her circle prioritized the interests of corporate clients—such as the pharmaceutical, processed food, and pesticide industries—over the MAGA movement's goals (-, -).

Dramatic Departure: Citing reports from the Daily Mail, the host describes an allegedly "fiery" confrontation in the Oval Office where President Trump demanded Wiles leave immediately following the poor midterm election results (-).

Financial Conflicts: The host emphasizes transparency, commending Stephen Miller's wife, Katie Miller, for selling her stock and ending her media projects to avoid potential conflicts of interest, and criticizing the influence of lobbying firms on federal policy (-, -).

Trump hires a lot of people, and he delegated his authority to them if he deemed them useful and capable, though maybe with a bad reputation as cautioned by those who knew these people personally. But he will fire them quickly once their corruption is exposed or they fail to adequately do their jobs.

In this case with Susie Wiles, the most praised woman is quickly fired after she has exposed herself as being corrupt, controlling, and ineffective, losing for Trump the core MAHA coalition and others who saw that she has sold her influence to anyone who has money, particularly the pharmaceutical companies poisoning America.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoURR6TOHHw

The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals approved my case for oral argument on December 16th. They did this because they see merit in my case. Keep praying for an overwhelmingly favorable outcome. Pray for my attorney - Mark Brown - who will be making the argument in person. Also, keep praying and fighting for another pardon from Trump so I can be out sooner. Thank you all for everything that you do big and small.